Abstract:
Technical and economic considerations have been the basis of taking decisions in
planning of water development projects in Bangladesh. Conditions of many of the projects
deteriorate soon after completion and overall project performance is often unsatisfactory.
Several studies have indicated that much of the poor performance of these projects stems
from fundamental weakness in the processes of planning and management when social
dimensions are usually ignored. No amount of investment in technological hardware can
overcome it. It is now recognised that participation of beneficiaries in planning can help
overcome many of the weaknesses, but advantages of such approach has yet to be
quantified. However, many planners would argue that there are potential risks and costs
implicit in people's participation.
Provision of beneficiaries participation in the operation and maintenance (O&M) of Flood
Control. Drainage and Irrigation (FCDI) projects is not new in Bangladesh. Early
Implementation Project (EIP) and other similar projects had initiated such approach in the
late seventies. Involvement of beneficiaries in the planning stage was part of planning
process under Second Small Scale Flood Control; Drainage and Irrigation (SSFCDI) Project
which was initiated in 1987. This study was undertaken to quantify the impact of
. beneficiaries participation in the planning of water development prOject based on an
assessment of impact of such participation.
As of December 31 1992, 112 projects were planned with beneficiaries participation
through 112 preproject meetings (PPMs) under SSFCDI Project. A PPM was organized at the
pre-planning stage where the discussions were held with the representatives of local
residents and relevant agencies at or near the project site. Under this study, all 112 projects
of SSFCDI Project were reviewed to establish a quantitative evaluation of beneficiaries
involvement in the planning process. FeaSibility reports of all the 112 projects were
collected from BWDB. The impact of beneficiaries participation in the planning of each
project which was evident from the changes that were incorporated in finalizing the project
planning was critically evaluated.The existing planning procedures of water development
projects were compared with planning of the SSFDCI projects. Three projects were selected
from the list of 112 for indepth studies to assess the impact of beneficiaries involvement in
the plan.
It is seen from the study that the traditional planning process of Bangladesh Water
Development Board (BWDB) hardly pays any attention to user requirements, future O&M
plan and system performance evaluation. Data for smaller FCD projects remains a major
constraint as reliable information on water level, diSCharge, rainfall of such basins are
difficult of obtain.
It is observed that the PPMs are well representative of 5 regions of Bangladesh. It showed
that the data reliability has improved significantly due to the involvement of beneficiaries
in the plann~ng. The information provided in the PPMs were based on their real life
experiences which has enhanced the data quality. The quality of data was observed good in
57% projects while it was moderate in 41% and poor in 2% projects.
The PPMs of 112 projects with local residents acted as a forum for communicating expected
project benefits and as a mechanism for obtaining feedback that in a number of instances
has resulted in modifications and even abandonment of the projects as originally
conceived. Due to the PPMs, 34 projects (30%) were found modified and 14 projects (13%)
were redundant. Of these 34 projects 26 needed major modification, 6 needed minor
modifications, but for the rest two an overall conceptual change in the planning objective
was necessary.
Local Project Committees (LPCs) were constituted only for the projects which were accepted
by the participants in the PPMs. However, the meetings served a limited purpose in the
area of obtaining serious inputs for the project planning and design due to weakness in
holding of the PPMs; time and resource constraints. Many PPMs were dominated by the
vested interest groups present in the meetings. However, it did not distort the data quality
Significantly. The local residents raised all related aspects of. their daily life. The
beneficiaries provided more specific information on the rehabilitation projects than new
type of projects in the PPMs because of their experiences with the former type of projects. In
the PPMs of new projects, their e.xpectation was found higher. In these meetings local officials of BWDB, Directorate of Agricultural Extension (DAE),
Directorate of Fisheries (DOF), Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB), Local
Government and Engineering Department (LGED), Non-government Organization (NGO)
and elected officials of Union Parishad (UP) and Thana Parishad also participated. From
local residents farmer, fishermen, boatmen, women, project outsiders etc. of a project
attended in each PPM. About 4.5% of the total residents participated in the meeting. Such
participation was observed inadequate and not suffiCiently representated for many
projects. Usually, one PPM was conducted for one project, but it was found that one PPM for
a project larger than 3000 ha was not enough to bring representation from all villages of
the basin. The PPMs became a common platform to establish linkage among the
government agencies, NGOs and residents. Disbenefit groups and women were not present
in many meetings. The largest group of local agencies was from thana parish ad and that of
residents was the farmers. It was possible to cross -check the information disseminated by
the beneficiaries right at the PPMs with the dilTerent local agencies.
The projects selected for case studies were: Panchanala Koya BeeIs of Northwest region;
Suktajuri khal of Northeast region; and Bamansundar khal of Southeast region.
According to the studies. it is observed that the beneficiaries involvement has improved the
planning standards of water development projects and encouraged their active
participation in the operation and maintenance.