Abstract:
In Bangladesh, about 63% of the arable land is now irrigated and there is immense pressure to
bring more areas under irrigation. But the expansion of irrigation has been thwarted due to reduced
transboundary flow, unplanned and unregulated withdrawal of groundwater and inefficient
management. Improvement of irrigation efficiency (IE) and efficient management would have a
dominant role in enhancing the development of irrigation. In this context, this study was taken up
with the objectives of estimating the present level of IE and water productivity (WP), determining
the parameters that affect the IE, and assessing the techno-socio-economic potentials for improving
the IE. The study was carried out in 7 districts of 5 agro-ecological zones. In total, 85 irrigation
schemes were selected in such a way that they represent all the major variables of irrigation
performance namely, type of pumping technology (STW, DTW and LLP), source of water (surface
and groundwater), management system (public and private), pricing system (area based, time
based and crop share based), water distribution system (buried pipe, lined and earthen canal) and
source of energy (diesel and electricity). In addition, field experiments were also carried out to
study the impact of improved on- farm water management (alternate wetting and drying: AWD)
technology over the traditional practice of continuous flooding. Field data on pump discharge (Q),
total hours of pump operation (H), total irrigated area (A), crop yield, and rainfall data were
collected, and evapotranspiration (ETo) were estimated during the 2008 and 2009 irrigation
seasons. Participatory rural appraisal tools like, FGD and test of farmers' knowledge were
conducted in 5 upazilas in order to find out the reasons of using excess irrigation water and their
probable solutions, areas of farmers’ knowledge gap, acceptability of different technologies, etc.
From the analysis of field data on water requirement and supply and crop yield, the present
average IE and WP of the country were estimated as 34% and 0.498 kg/ m3(2006 lit/kg),
respectively. It was also found that the source of energy and types of irrigation equipment have no
significant impact on IE. The opportunity of improving the IE by implementing time based water
pricing system over area based system is 3.85%, that of lined canal system over earthen canal is
3.37% and that of AWD technology is about 6.28%. The improvement of IE due to management
system i.e. public-private-partnership (PPP) over privately managed scheme is about 2.65%.
Buried pipe system and crop shared method increased the IE by 6.38% and 1.63%, respectively
over earthen-area based system. From mathematical calculation and regression analyses, the
combined contribution of water pricing system (time based), water distribution system (buried
pipe), management system (PPP) and AWD, in increasing the IE from the base condition of
earthen-area based-private system varied from 17.55% to 18.84%. From the farmers’ survey, it
was found that the knowledge gap of farmers about on- farm water management technology is the
highest among all the four important agricultural inputs and services. Besides, the four selected
indicators are also found to be techno-socio-economically viable and sustainable, if these are
implemented in integrated manner. Creation of awareness among different stakeholders through
training and demonstration for rapid dissemination of AWD technology and introduction of
demand based water marketing system instead of supply based system can be achieved with
minimum financial implication. Replacement of earthen canal by construction of lined canal and
buried pipe may be done in phases but would require active participation of all the concerned
stakeholders and introduction of PPP approach for participatory irrigation water management.
Considering the food security, economic development, poverty reduction and protection of natural
environment, the government should take the opportunity of the abovementioned variables in an
integrated manner for increasing IE from 34% to close to its potential value of 50%.