Abstract:
Species tree estimation from multi-locus datasets is extremely challenging, especially in the presence of gene tree heterogeneity across the genome due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Summary methods have been developed which estimate gene trees and then combine the gene trees to estimate a species tree by optimizing various optimization scores. In this study, we have extended and adapted the concept of phylogenetic terraces to species tree estimation by “summarizing” a set of gene trees, where multiple species trees with distinct topologies may have exactly the same optimality score (i.e., quartet score, extra lineage score, etc.). We particularly investigated the presence and impacts of equally optimal trees in species tree estimation from multi-locus data using summary methods by taking ILS into account. We analyzed two of the most popular ILS-aware optimization criteria: maximize quartet consistency (MQC) and minimize deep coalescence (MDC). Methods based on MQC are provably statistically consistent, whereas MDC is not a consistent criterion for species tree estimation. We present a comprehensive comparative study of these two optimality criteria. Our experiments, on a collection of datasets simulated under ILS, indicate that MDC may result in competitive or identical quartet consistency score as MQC, but could be significantly worse than MQC in terms of tree accuracy – demonstrating the presence and impacts of equally optimal species trees. This is the first known study that provides the conditions for the datasets to have equally optimal trees in the context of phylogenomic inference using summary methods.
